3D Artists from Over 65 Countries

What is Real Time Rendering and Why It Matters

Real-time rendering is slowly creeping its way into the design industry. Click to learn what that means, and what it means for the future.

Current technology and available software has elevated rendering from an industry once reserved only for computer geeks to a rapidly expanding field that includes artists, architects, engineers, developers and pretty much everything else under the sun. But, there are limits to that technology that have those professionals running into walls when it comes to making the next big leap into mainstream rendering and visualization. So, when you can’t figure out how to make the car go faster, what do you do?

Invent a time machine.

Yes, there’s a new horizon in mainstream architectural rendering and visualization, and its name is real time rendering, and while it can’t actually send you into the future (yet), it’s a technique that’s growing in stature and usability in the various communities that rely on being on the precipice of rendering and visualization technique. In this article, you’ll learn all about real time rendering, and why it matters as we think about the future of design and design communication.

So? What is it?

Real Time Rendering is pretty much exactly what it sounds like: animations that are rendered so quickly they appear to be being generated in absolute real time. But to fully understand what’s really going on under the hood, first we’ll have to talk about the pipeline.

The graphics rendering pipeline, which we will now and forever simply refer to as “the pipeline,” has nothing to do with surfing or the rapid transportation of natural gas or crude oil. The pipeline represents the foundation of any visualization or rendering engine. It is where the rendering of all 3D objects, light sources, lighting models, textures, cameras and more happens. Some also refer to it in layman’s terms as “the magic.”

Specifically, the real-time rendering pipeline consists of three conceptual stages: the application stage, the geometry stage, and the rasterizing stage. I won’t bore you any longer with digging any deeper into that bottomless technical well, but the end result is an animation that is rendered in what appears to be real-time, and is measured in frames produced per second.

Now, real-time rendering is nothing new. Anyone who’s picked up a videogame controller has experienced it first-hand. The videogame industry has been implementing real-time rendering in games for decades, but only recently have designers and architects started using some of those techniques to present their ideas.

Sounds like a no-brainer right? The ability to hand your client a PS4 controller and give them an interactive virtual tour of where their money is about to be poured into is on a whole nother level of multimedia presentations. But why has it take so long for the design and architecture industries to adapt this technology? Why are so many firms stuck in the stone age with static images and spliced together animations that read more like diagrams than immersive representational experiences?

The Easy Answer Is Money

It always is, isn’t it? Ask me how much videogame studio Rockstar North recently spent on their mega-hit game Grand Theft Auto 5 and I’ll tell you a figure with so many zeros at the end you’ll think I’m speaking in binary. Developing even a simple scene that can be interacted with at the most fundamental level is expensive and time consuming. This price of admission is an immediate turn-off to most architecture and design firms who have a limited amount of time and money to put together a design presentation, and will almost never spend it on something so extravagant.

The other answer - the answer I believe to be more true than simply money - is that architects have no idea how to implement this type of experience. In a profession where control is often your only ally, relinquishing that control to someone who might not understand the design on a fundamental or even surface level is as ludicrous as not wearing a black turtleneck to work today. Architects give presentations that are so canned and so precisely manicured it leaves those who are viewing it only one possible conclusion about the validity and conceptual fortitude of the proposal.

Ultimately, it’s about an unfamiliarity with a potentially effective avenue for explaining ideas that have just always been shown in a pretty picture. And while the nature of those pictures has inevitably evolved over the years as technology led the way to computer aided realism, the backbone has remained relatively untouched. It all points back to control. A static image, or even a pre-planned animation, offers a stranglehold of controllable inputs and outputs that results in the perfect representation of the idea for everyone to see. The merits of the design, in that scenario, have as much to do with the skill required to tell the story than the story itself.

So, you can imagine the deer-in-headlights reaction an architect or designer has when approached with the notion of relinquishing some of the control for providing people with a more realistic, interactive version of their design. It’s scary, because for the first time your design will be judged with unprecedented accuracy before a single shovel-full of dirt comes out of the ground.

Making The Process Better

While relinquishing that kind of control during a presentation to a client might be territory we never find ourselves entering in the world of design and architecture, I see real-time rendering as an important stepping stone in making the design process better. This is where the merits of the technology really start to show up.

The design process is all about a continuous loop of trial and feedback, trial and feedback, trial and feedback - until you’re either up against a deadline or run out of money. Good architects and designers champion their process with the highest regard, as it is the engine that powers their entire production machine. And if the process is the engine, the feedback is the oil - the lifeblood that makes all the other parts work. Feedback tells you what’s right and what’s wrong, and analyzing it tells the designer how to make things better. Real-time rendering would provide the designer with the kind of audio-visual feedback unlike anything we’ve seen before.

The idea is this: an architect would invest in people familiar with real-time rendering technology that would build an interactive world around the site of any particular project. At the onset of a project, this interactive environment could be used by the design team to test concepts, ideas, and ultimately fully fledged experiences that revolve around the thing that will eventually be built. The feedback goes from being a preconceived judgement of a static object, to an unpredictable emotional and physiological response to something that assaults the senses with information regarding light, space, material and procession simultaneously. I’m frothing at the mouth just thinking about it.

Furthermore, the recent surge in virtual reality technology takes this feedback loop a substantial step further. It has the potential to add layers of depth and output that will have designers reacting and making design decisions based on an almost 1:1 analogous experience to what is to be a realized building.

Of Course, There Are Limitations

Remember all that talk about money? Yeah...that’s still a thing. Despite the unimaginable potential real-time rendering carries, it would take a large firm with a substantial design budget to really make it feasible. Those firms are certainly out there, and I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of Bjork Ingles and Norman Foster aren’t tinkering with the possibilities as we speak. But for the rest of us who cling to our meager flat-rate fees, interactive design presentations is more than just out of arm’s reach. It will be interesting to see how far the big guns take it, and we could be looking at a future where architecture offices look more and more like video game development studios.

There’s always a tipping point - a fulcrum where the cost of adaptation is lapped by the money-making potential of a vital piece of tech. Energy will never become sustainable until solar and wind power become more lucrative than crude oil. It will happen eventually, but it’s anyone’s guess as to when. Real-time rendering as a design tool is the same thing. As soon as architects - and more importantly, clients - see the long-term value of that investment, it will remain waiting loudly on the fringe.

But as that fringe slowly grows, so will the pool of talented designers who will learn how to do this stuff in architecture and design school. Just as it happened with CAD, and SketchUp, and Photoshop and VRAY and Rhino and everything else, these techniques and programs will elevate to the necessary tools of the trade. Sometimes these shifts take time to ferment, and this is one that requires a massive ground swell of momentum to get traction. And it’s only a matter of time before that happens.

3D Rendering Costs Overview: What You Need to Invest to Create a Competent Team
Things You Need to Organize a 3D Rendering Architectural Project
8 Reasons Why 3D Rendering Marketing is Experiencing Amazing Growth
8 Tweaks to Speed Up 3D Rendering Cycles
What are the Capabilities of 3D Rendering in Architecture
3D Rendering and Photo Realism: 10 Best Practices and Tips
7 3D Rendering Issues That Commonly Pop Up in Projects
13 Expert Tips to Help You Manage 3D Rendering
Why 3D Rendering Plans Overtook 2D Cad Plans in Popularity
North American 3D Rendering is Expected to Achieve Amazing Growth until 2025
Rendering Trends - 7 Popular Styles of Architectural Rendering Software Use
Side by Side Comparison of Still 3D Renders and Animation
The State of 3D Rendering and Virtualization Software 2018-2023
Google and Sony Discuss Collaboration on OpenCue Rendering Software Manager
3D Rendering Techniques – 5 Tips to Help You Streamline The Entire Process
How to Achieve Photo-Realistic 3D Renders in 2019 and Beyond
6 Devices That Will Help You Streamline 3D Architectural Modelling
3D Rendering – Then and Now
Designer Tips How to Get Exactly What You Need Out of Your Renderings
5 Business Benefits of 3D Rendering for Architectural and Construction Companies
The 3D Rendering Software Market is Growing Fast - Here's Why
How to Build a PC for 3D Rendering on a Budget
4 Essential 3D Rendering Tutorials for Noobs
Nvidia Unveils the Turing GPU Architecture for 3D Rendering
5 Ways Architects Can Invest in 3D Rendering
Where To Find 3D Rendering Jobs Online
7 Rendering Styles for Architectural Interiors
Real Time Rendering - The Future of 3D Visualization
7 Ways Architects Can Use 3D Rendering
5 Online Resources for Free Rendering Materials
3D Rendering for Real Estate Marketing
Work With The Best 3D Rendering Studios
What is Real Time Rendering and Why It Matters
The Five Best Companies For 3D Rendering Services
The 3D rendering boom in real estate marketing
Product rendering and visualization
Landscape architecture and 3D rendering
Best Free 3d Modeling Software
Best 3D Rendering Services.
3D Rendering and Visualisation in London
3D Renderings: Prices as low as €80 per Image
3D Printing, Architecture and Contour Crafting - The Futuristic Architect
7 Tips For Learning Photoshop
Best Online Resources for Learning 3D Rendering and Visualization
The Best Ways To Utilize Outsourced 3D Rendering Work
5 Reasons Why Photorealistic Renderings are Important for Architecture Firms
Why and How you should outsource you 3d Renderings
What does VR mean for digital innovation
Where to find the best 3d characters
Should a good architect know how to 3D Render
Best 3D Furniture Model Sites for Architects and 3D Artists
Best Texture Resources for Architects and 3D Artists
How Photorealistic Rendering Can Sell Your Next Design
The Anatomy of a 3D Building Rendering
The Best Free 3D Rendering Resources For Freelancers
5 Great Online 3D Modeling Catalogues
Why should I outsource my 3d renderings
Best Render Farms